Let’s close our eyes and imagine a Patan Durbar Square where there are no vehicles on the major streets—children playing outside, elderly people chatting and resting on ancient falchas (resting places), the sound of people greeting each other with “Tare Mam,” and the early morning and evening bhajan (musical rituals) preserving the essence of this heritage area. For generations, Patan Durbar Square had such a rhythm—an environment where people connected with one another.
However, the rhythm we see today is entirely different due to growing haphazard urbanization and commercialization. The encroachment of vehicles and unorganized parking has limited outdoor activities for both children and the elderly. Recalling my childhood in the narrow streets of Patan Durbar Square, the places where I used to play have now turned into parking areas. Falchas, once spaces to sit and relax, are now often empty or unsafe due to fast-moving vehicles. Children are increasingly absorbed in the digital world, moving away from community socialization. In the long run, this detachment directly affects our physical, psychological, and social well-being.
Heritage areas within the Kathmandu Valley are key zones that preserve this ancient rhythm. However, with the increasing number of vehicles, these social spaces are being compromised.
Allowing more vehicles inside heritage zones also leads to greater congestion. Congestion is often treated as a technical problem with technical solutions such as road expansion, one-way systems, flyovers, and overhead bridges. However, such approaches often ignore the street users’ lived experience and how streets actually function. The heritage zone of Patan Durbar Square was never designed for cars. According to recent World Bank data, nearly 90 percent of Lalitpur’s inner-city streets are less than three meters wide, yet they are expected to accommodate large vehicles entering narrow heritage lanes.
Even electric vehicles, despite their environmental benefits, occupy the same space and create similar safety risks in such narrow streets. With increasing vehicular encroachment, pedestrians are pushed aside, making it unsafe for children to play and depriving elderly people of resting spaces. This directly reduces meaningful social interaction. What results is mobility without meaning in a heritage zone.
Dhanush and his wife Aishwaryaa Rajinikanth part ways after 18...
The real question is not how to fit vehicles into Patan Durbar Square, but why we continue to impose them on such spaces. In this context, the recent two-month vehicle-free initiative by Lalitpur Metropolitan City under the City Pride Project, supported by the Nepal Cycle Society’s “Patan Paila Pailama,” has shown both promising results and important lessons.
During the vehicle-free trial around Patan Durbar Square, significant changes were observed. Streets that were once filled with vehicles became walkable for children. Parking spaces were transformed into play areas. Falchas regained their purpose. Elderly people and children reclaimed public space. Compared to normal days, pedestrian numbers doubled in some streets and tripled during vehicle-free hours. Vehicle traffic dropped by up to 90 percent. Air quality improved noticeably, with PM2.5 levels falling below World Health Organization guidelines during restricted hours. Noise levels were also significantly reduced.
Walking became safer for both children and elderly people. These outcomes were not accidental—they resulted directly from the removal of vehicles. This reflects a globally proven phenomenon: streets and people interact dynamically.
Donald Appleyard’s landmark studies in San Francisco showed that heavy traffic leads to fewer friendships, weaker community bonds, and a reduced sense of belonging. This experience in Patan confirms that such detachment is already taking shape due to vehicular encroachment.
During the trial, the strongest criticism came from local business owners who feared losing customers. Many believed that shoppers were accustomed to riding vehicles directly to shopfronts, sometimes purchasing goods without even stepping out. They assumed fewer vehicles would mean fewer customers.
However, the trial showed otherwise. During vehicle-free hours, businesses did not experience a decline. On busy stretches such as Mangal Bazaar to Chakrabahil Chowk, increased foot traffic made streets more lively and inviting. Visitors felt safer, stayed longer, and expressed willingness to return more often if streets remained car-free.
This shift was also reflected in survey results: nearly 80 percent of respondents—including residents, visitors, and business owners—supported continuing or expanding the initiative. Examples such as Hadigaun’s weekly vehicle-free streets and the recently introduced pedestrian-friendly zones in Ason further demonstrate that safer, cleaner streets attract more people. Ultimately, it is people—not vehicles—that sustain local businesses.
Change is often resisted. Some residents raised concerns about mobility inconvenience. Business owners feared losses and parking shortages. Delivery logistics and school transport required adjustments. Ongoing road construction nearby also disrupted traffic flow. These challenges remain, but they require better planning rather than compromising people-centered streets.
Most of these concerns can be addressed through thoughtful measures such as designated delivery time windows, alternative access routes, clear parking zones, and better coordination of construction schedules. The most difficult challenge, however, is the psychological impact of long-term vehicle dominance in public life.
Across the world, pedestrianization has brought positive change. This process does not mean avoiding conflict, but managing it without compromising a shared urban vision.
Patan Durbar Square was enlisted as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1979, with its boundary marked by stone inscriptions. However, heritage is not preserved by stone alone. It survives through daily use, rituals, interactions, and collective memory.
Heritage streets should not be filled with honking vehicles and empty sidewalks. In the name of “access,” allowing cars into heritage zones is a misinterpretation. True access means enabling people to walk freely, pause, observe, gather, and participate.
It also means creating spaces where children and elderly people can interact, learn, and play—not spaces governed by strict rules designed to exclude traffic. The recent vehicle-free trial has demonstrated tangible benefits. The key question now is whether this will remain a temporary experiment or become the foundation for a more people-centered urban future.
